http://www.gutenberg.org/files/27114/27114-h/27114-h.html#toc29
=============================
THE PERSIAN WAR
The cities were governed by tyrants, who were sustained in their usurpation by the power of Persia, then the great power of the world. Darius, then king, had absurdly invaded Scythia, with an immense army of six hundred thousand men, to punish the people for their inroad upon Western Asia, subject to his sway, about a century before. He was followed by his allies, the tyrants of the Ionian cities, to whom he intrusted the guardianship of the bridge of boats by which he had crossed the Danube, B.C. 510. As he did not return within the time specified—sixty days—the Greeks were left at liberty to return. A body of Scythians then appeared, who urged the Greeks to destroy the bridge, as Darius was in full retreat, and thus secure the destruction of the Persian army and the recovery of their own liberty. Miltiades, who ruled the Chersonese—the future hero of Marathon, seconded the wise proposal of the Scythians, but Histiæus, tyrant of Miletus, feared that such an act would recoil upon themselves, and favor another inroad of Scythians—a fierce nation of barbarians. The result was that the bridge was not destroyed, but the further end of it was severed from the shore. Night arrived, and the [pg 206] Persian hosts appeared upon the banks of the river, but finding no trace of it, Darius ordered an Egyptian who had a trumpet-voice to summon to his aid Histiæus, the Milesian. He came forward with a fleet and restored the bridge, and Darius and his army were saved, and the opportunity was lost to the Ionians for emancipating themselves from the Persians. The bridge was preserved, not from honorable fidelity to fulfill a trust, but selfish regard in the despot of Miletus to maintain his power. For this service he was rewarded with a principality on the Strymon. Exciting, however, the suspicion of Darius, by his intrigues, he was carried captive to the Persian court, but with every mark of honor. Darius left his brother Artaphernes as governor of all the cities in Western Asia Minor.
A few years after this unsuccessful invasion of Scythia by Darius, a political conflict broke out in Naxos, an island of the Cyclades, B.C. 502, which had not submitted to the Persian yoke, and the oligarchy, which ruled the island, were expelled. They applied for aid to Aristagoras, the tyrant of Miletus, the largest of the Ionian cities, who persuaded the Persian satrap to send an expedition against the island. The expedition failed, which ruined the credit of Aristagoras, son-in-law to Histiæus, who was himself incensed at his detention in Susa, and who sent a trusty slave with a message urging the Ionians to revolt. Aristagoras, as a means of success, conciliated popular favor throughout Asiatic Greece, by putting down the various tyrants—the instruments of Persian ascendency. The flames of revolt were kindled, the despots were expelled, the revolted towns were put in a state of defense, and Aristagoras visited Sparta to invoke its aid, inflaming the mind of the king with the untold wealth of Asia, which would become his spoil. Sparta was then at war with her neighbors, and unwilling to become involved in so uncertain a contest. Rejected at Sparta, Aristagoras proceeded to Athens, then the second power in Greece, and was favorably received, for the Athenians had a powerful sympathy with the revolted [pg 207] Ionians; they agreed to send a fleet of twenty ships. When Aristagoras returned, the Persians had commenced the siege of Miletus. The twenty ships soon crossed the Ægean, and were joined by five Eretrian ships coming to the succor of Miletus. An unsuccessful attempt of Aristagoras on Sardis disgusted the Athenians, who abandoned the alliance. But the accidental burning of the city, including the temple of the goddess Cybele, encouraged the revolters, and incensed the Persians. Other Greek cities on the coast took part in the revolt, including the island of Cyprus. The revolt now assumed a serious character. The Persians rallied their allies, among whom were the Phœnicians. An armament of Persians and Phœnicians sailed against Cyprus, and a victory on the land gave the Persians the control of the island. A large army of Persians and their allies collected at Sardis, and, under different divisions reconquered all their principal Ionian cities, except Miletus; but the Ionian fleet kept its ascendency at sea. Aristagoras as the Persians advanced, lost courage and fled to Myrkinus, where he shortly afterward perished.
Meanwhile Histiæus presented himself at the gates of Miletus, having procured the consent of Darius to proceed thither to quell the revolt. He was, however, suspected by the satrap, Artaphernes, and fled to Chios, whose people he gained over, and who carried him back to Miletus. On his arrival, he found the citizens averse to his reception, and was obliged to return to Chios, and then to Lesbos, where he abandoned himself to piracy.
A vast Persian host, however, had been concentrated near Miletus, and with the assistance of the Phœnicians, invested the city by sea and land. The entire force of the confederated cities abandoned the Milesians to their fate, and took to their ships, three hundred and fifty-three in number, with a view of fighting the Phœnicians, who had six hundred ships. But there was a want of union among the Ionian commanders, and the sailors abandoned themselves to disorder and carelessness; upon which [pg 208] Dionysius, of Phocæa, which furnished but three ships, rebuked the Ionians for their neglect of discipline. His rebuke was not thrown away, and the Ionians having their comfortable tents on shore, submitted themselves to the nautical labors imposed by Dionysius. At last, after seven days of work, the Ionian sailors broke out in open mutiny, and refused longer to be under the discipline of a man whose State furnished the smallest number of ships. They left their ships, and resumed their pleasures on the shore, unwilling to endure the discipline so necessary in so great a crisis. Their camp became a scene of disunion and mistrust. The Samians, in particular, were discontented, and on the day of battle, which was to decide the fortunes of Ionia, they deserted with sixty ships, and other Ionians followed their example. The ships of Chios, one hundred in number, fought with great fidelity and resolution, and Dionysius captured, with his three ships, three of the Phœnicians'. But these exceptional examples of bravery did not compensate the treachery and cowardice of the rest, and the consequence was a complete defeat of the Ionians at Lade. Dionysius, seeing the ruin of the Ionian camp, did not return to his own city, and set sail for the Phœnician coast, doing all he could as a pirate.
This victory of Lade enabled the Persians to attack Miletus by sea as well as land; the siege was prosecuted with vigor, and the city shortly fell. The adult male population was slain, while the women and children were sent as slaves to Susa. The Milesian territory was devastated and stripped of its inhabitants. The other States hastened to make their submission, and the revolt was crushed, B.C. 496, five years after its commencement. The Persian forces reconquered all the Asiatic Greeks, insular and continental, and the Athenian Miltiades escaped with difficulty from his command in the Chersonese, to his native city. All the threats which were made by the Persians were realized. The most beautiful virgins were distributed among the Persian nobles; the [pg 209] cities were destroyed; and Samos alone remained, as a reward for desertion at the battle of Lade
The reconquest of Ionia being completed, the satrap proceeded to organize the future government, the inhabitants now being composed of a great number of Persians. Meanwhile, Darius made preparations for the complete conquest of Greece. The wisdom of the advice of Miltiades, to destroy the bridge over the Danube, when Darius and his army would have been annihilated by the Scythians, was now apparent. Mardonius was sent with a large army into Ionia, who deposed the despots in the various cities, whom Artaphernes had reinstated, and left the people to govern themselves, subject to the Persian dominion and tribute. He did not remain long in Ionia, but passed with his fleet to the Hellespont, and joined his land forces. He transported his army to Europe, and began his march through Thrace. Thence marched into Macedonia, and subdued a part of its inhabitants. He then sent his fleet around Mount Athos, with a view of joining it with his army at the Gulf of Therma. But a storm overtook his fleet near Athos, and destroyed three hundred ships, and drowned twenty thousand men. This disaster compelled a retreat, and he recrossed the Hellespont with the shame of failure. He was employed no more by the Persian king.
Darius, incited by the traitor Hippias, made new preparation for the invasion of Greece. He sent his heralds in every direction, demanding the customary token of submission—earth and water. Many of the continental cities sent in their submission, including the Thebans, Thessalians, and the island of Ægina, which was on bad terms with Athens. The heralds of Darius were put to death at Athens and Sparta, which can only be explained from the fiercest resentment and rage. These two powers made common cause, and armed all the other States over which they had influence, to resist the Persian domination. Hellas, headed by Sparta, now resolved to put forth all its energies, and [pg 210] embarked, in desperate hostility. A war which Sparta had been waging for several years against Argos crippled that ancient State, and she was no longer the leading power. The only rival which Sparta feared was weakened, and full scope was given, for the prosecution of the Persian war. Ægina, which had submitted to Darius, was visited by Cleomenes, king of Sparta, and hostages were sent to Athens for the neutrality of that island. Athens and Sparta suspended their political jealousies, and acted in concert to resist the common danger.
By the spring of 490 B.C. the preparations of Darius were completed, and a vast army collected on a plain upon the Cilician shore. A fleet of six hundred ships convoyed it to the rendezvous at Samos. The exiled tyrant Hippias was present to guide the forces to the attack of Attica. The Mede Datis, and Artaphernes, son of the satrap of Sardis, nephew to Darius, were the Persian generals. They had orders from Darius to bring the inhabitants of Athens as slaves to his presence.
The Persian fleet, fearing a similar disaster as happened near Mount Athos, struck directly across the Ægean, from Samos to Eubœa, attacking on the way the intermediate islands. Naxos thus was invaded and easily subdued. From Naxos, Datis sent his fleet round the other Cyclades Islands, demanding reinforcements and hostages from all he visited, and reached the southern extremity of Eubœa in safety. Etruria was first subdued, unable to resist. After halting a few days at this city, he crossed to Attica, and landed in the bay of Marathon, on the eastern coast. The despot Hippias, son of Pisistratus, twenty years after his expulsion from Athens, pointed out the way.
But a great change had taken place at Athens since his expulsion. The city was now under democratic rule, in its best estate. The ten tribes had become identified with the government and institutions of the city. The senate of the areopagus, renovated by the annual archons, was in sympathy with the people. Great men had [pg 211] arisen under the amazing stimulus of liberty, among whom Miltiades, Themistocles, and Aristides were the most distinguished. Miltiades, after an absence of six years in the Chersonesus of Thrace, returned to the city full of patriotic ardor. He was brought to trial before the popular assembly on the charge of having misgoverned the Chersonese; but he was honorably acquitted, and was chosen one of the ten generals of the republic annually elected. He was not, however, a politician of the democratic stamp, like Themistocles and Aristides, being a descendant of an illustrious race, which traced their lineage to the gods; but he was patriotic, brave, and decided. His advice to burn the bridge over the Danube illustrates his character—bold and far-seeing. Moreover, he was peculiarly hostile to Darius, whom he had so grievously offended.
Themistocles was a man of great native genius and sagacity. He comprehended all the embarrassments and dangers of the political crisis in which his city was placed, and saw at a glance the true course to be pursued. He was also bold and daring. He was not favored by the accidents of birth, and owed very little to education. He had an unbounded passion for glory and for display. He had great tact in the management of party, and was intent on the aggrandizement of his country. His morality was reckless, but his intelligence was great—a sort of Mirabeau: with his passion, his eloquence, and his talents. His unfortunate end—a traitor and an exile—shows how little intellectual pre-eminence will avail, in the long run, without virtue, although such talents as he exhibited will be found useful in a crisis.
Aristides was inferior to both Alcibiades and Themistocles in genius, in resource, in boldness, and in energy; but superior in virtue, in public fidelity, and moral elevation. He pursued a consistent course, was no demagogue, unflinching in the discharge of trusts, just, upright, unspotted. Such a man, of course, in a corrupt society, would be exposed to many enmities and jealousies. [pg 212] But he was, on the whole, appreciated, and died, in a period of war and revolution, a poor man, with unbounded means of becoming rich—one of the few examples which our world affords of a man who believed in virtue, in God, and a judgment to come, and who preferred the future and spiritual to the present and material—a fool in the eyes of the sordid and bad—a wise man according to the eternal standards.
Aristides, Miltiades, and perhaps Themistocles, were elected among the ten generals, by the ten tribes, in the year that Datis led his expedition to Marathon. Each of the ten generals had the supreme command of the army for a day. Great alarm was felt at Athens as tidings reached the city of the advancing and conquering Persians. Couriers were sent in hot haste to the other cities, especially Sparta, and one was found to make the journey to Sparta on foot—one hundred and fifty miles—in forty-eight hours. The Spartans agreed to march, without delay, after the last quarter of the moon, which custom and superstition dictated. This delay was fraught with danger, but was insisted upon by the Spartans.
Meanwhile the dangers multiplied and thickened, that not a moment should be lost in bringing the Persians into action. Five of the generals counseled delay. The polemarch, Calimachus, who then had the casting vote, decided for immediate action. Themistocles and Aristides had seconded the advice of Miltiades, to whom the other generals surrendered their days of command—a rare example of patriotic disinterestedness. The Athenians marched at once to Marathon to meet their foes, and were joined by the Platæans, one thousand warriors, from a little city—the whole armed population, which had a great moral effect.
The Athenians had only ten thousand hoplites, including the one thousand from Platæa. The Persian army is variously estimated at from one hundred and ten thousand to six hundred thousand. The Greeks [pg 213] were encamped upon the higher ground overlooking the plain which their enemies occupied. The fleet was ranged along the beach. The Greeks advanced to the combat in rapid movement, urged on by the war-cry, which ever animated their charges. The wings of the Persian army were put to flight by the audacity of the charge, but the centre, where the best troops were posted, resisted the attack until Miltiades returned from the pursuit of the retreating soldiers on the wings. The defeat of the Persians was the result. They fled to their ships, and became involved in the marshes. Six thousand four hundred men fell on the Persian side, and only one hundred and ninety-two on the Athenian. The Persians, though defeated, still retained their ships, and sailed toward Cape Sunium, with a view of another descent upon Attica. Miltiades, the victor in the most glorious battle ever till then fought in Greece, penetrated the designs of the Persians, and rapidly retreated to Athens on the very day of battle. Datis arrived at the port of Phalerum to discover that his plans were baffled, and that the Athenians were still ready to oppose him. The energy and promptness of Miltiades had saved the city. Datis, discouraged, set sail, without landing, to the Cyclades
The battle of Marathon, B.C. 490, must be regarded as one of the great decisive battles of the world, and the first which raised the political importance of the Greeks in the eyes of foreign powers. It was fought by Athens twenty years after the expulsion of the tyrants, and as a democratic State. On the Athenians rest the glory forever. It was not important for the number of men who fell on either side, but for giving the first great check to the Persian domination, and preventing their conquest of Europe. And its moral effect was greater than its political. It freed the Greeks from that fear of the Persians which was so fatal and universal, for the tide of Persian conquest had been hitherto uninterrupted. It animated the Greeks with fresh courage, for the bravery of the Athenians [pg 214] had been unexampled, as had been the generalship of Miltiades. Athens was delivered by the almost supernatural bravery of its warriors, and was then prepared to make those sacrifices which were necessary in the more desperate struggles which were to come. And it inspired the people with patriotic ardor, and upheld the new civil constitution. It gave force and dignity to the democracy, and prepared it for future and exalted triumphs. It also gave force to the religious sentiments of the people, for such a victory was regarded as owing to the special favor of the gods.
The Spartans did not arrive until after the battle had been fought, and Datis had returned with his Etrurian prisoners to Asia.
The victory of Marathon raised the military fame of Miltiades
to the most exalted height, and there were
no bounds to the enthusiasm of the Athenians.
But the victory turned his head, and he lost both prudence
and patriotism. He persuaded his countrymen, in the full
tide of his popularity, to intrust him with seventy ships,
with an adequate force, with powers to direct an expedition
according to his pleasure. The armament was cheerfully
granted. But he disgracefully failed in an attack on the
island of Paros, to gratify a private vindictive animosity.
He lost all his éclat and was impeached. He
appealed, wounded and disabled from a fall he had
received, to his previous services. He was found guilty, but
escaped the penalty of death, but not of a fine of fifty talents.
He did not live to pay it, or redeem his fame, but
died of the injury he had received. Thus this
great man fell from a pinnacle of glory to the deepest disgrace
and ruin—a fate deserved, for he was not true to himself
or country. The Athenians were not to blame, but
judged him rightly. It was not fickleness, but a change in
their opinions, founded on sufficient grounds, from the deep
disappointment in finding that their hero was unworthy of
their regards. No man who had rendered a favor has a
claim to pursue a course of selfishness and unlawful ambition.
[pg 215]
No services can offset crimes. The Athenians, in
their unbounded admiration, had given unbounded trust,
and that trust was abused. And as the greatest despots
who had mounted to power had earned their success by
early services, so had they abused their power by imposing
fetters, and the Athenians, just escaped from the tyranny of
these despots, felt a natural jealousy and a deep repugnance,
in spite of their previous admiration. The Athenians, in their
treatment of Miltiades, were neither ungrateful nor fickle,
but acted from a high sense of public morality, and in a
stern regard to justice, without which the new constitution
would soon have been subverted. On the death of Miltiades
Themistocles and Aristides became the two leading
men of Athens, and their rivalries composed the
domestic history of the city, until the renewed and
vast preparations of the Persians caused all dissensions to be
suspended for the public good.
Not altogether
on
personal
grounds.
But the jealousies and rivalries of these great men were
not altogether personal. They were both patriotic, but each
had different views respecting the course which Athens should
adopt in the greatness of the dangers which impended. The
policy of Aristides was to strengthen the army—that of
Themistocles, the navy. Both foresaw the national dangers,
but Themistocles felt that the hopes of Greece rested on
ships rather than armies to resist the Persians.
And his policy was adopted. As the world can
not have two suns, so Athens could not be prospered
by the presence of two such great men, each advocating
different views. One or the other must succumb to the
general good, and Aristides was banished by the power of
ostracism.
Renewed
preparations
of Darius. His death.
The wrath of Darius—a man of great force of character,
but haughty and self-sufficient, was tremendous when he
learned the defeat of Datis, and his retreat into Asia. He
resolved to bring the whole force of the Persian
empire together to subdue the Athenians, from
whom he had suffered so great a disgrace. Three years were
[pg 216]
spent in active preparations for a new expedition which
should be overwhelming. All the allies of Persia were called
upon for men and supplies. Nor was he deterred by a revolt
of Egypt, which broke out about this time, and he was on
the point of carrying two gigantic enterprises—one
for the reconquest of Egypt, and the other for the
conquest of Greece—when he died, after a reign of thirty-six
years, B.C. 485.
Xerxes.
His enormous preparations. His bridges
over the
Hellespont.
He was succeeded by his son Xerxes, who was animated
by the animosities, but not the genius of his father.
Though beautiful and tall, he was faint-hearted,
vain, blinded by a sense of power, and enslaved by women.
Yet he continued the preparations which Darius projected.
Egypt was first subdued by his generals, and he then turned
his undivided attention to Greece. He convoked the dignitaries
of his empire—the princes and governors of provinces,
and announced his resolution to bridge over the Hellespont
and march to the conquest of Europe. Artabanus, his
uncle, dissuaded him from the enterprise, setting forth especially
the probability that the Greeks, if victorious at sea,
would destroy the bridge, and thus prevent his safe return.
Mardonius advised differently, urging ambition and revenge,
motives not lost on the Persian monarch. For four years
the preparations went forward from all parts of the empire,
including even the islands in the Ægean. In the autumn of
481 B.C., the largest army this world has ever seen assembled
at Sardis. Besides this, a powerful fleet of
one thousand two hundred and seven ships of war,
besides transports, was collected at the Hellespont. Large
magazines of provisions were formed along the coast of Asia
Minor. A double bridge of boats, extending from Abydos to
Sestos—a mile in length across the Hellespont, was constructed
by Phœnicians and Egyptians; but this was destroyed by a
storm. Xerxes, in a transport of fury, caused the heads of
the engineers to be cut off, and the sea itself scourged with
three hundred lashes. This insane wrath being expended,
the monarch caused the work to be at once reconstructed,
[pg 217]
this time by the aid of Greek engineers. Two bridges were
built side by side upon more than six hundred
large ships, moored with strong anchors, with their
heads toward the Ægean. Over each bridge were sketched six
vast cables, which held the ships together, and over these
were laid planks of wood, upon which a causeway was formed
of wood and earth, with a high palisade on each side. To
facilitate his march, Xerxes also constructed a canal across
the isthmus which connects Mount Athos with the main
land, on which were employed Phœnician engineers. The
men employed in digging the canal worked under the whip.
Bridges were also thrown across the river Strymon.
e crosses
the Hellespont. His review
of his army.
These works were completed while Xerxes wintered at
Sardis. From that city he dispatched heralds to all the
cities of Greece, except Sparta and Athens, to demand the
usual tokens of submission—earth and water. He also sent
orders to the maritime cities of Thrace and Macedonia to prepare
dinner for himself and hosts, as they passed through.
Greece was struck with consternation as the news reached
the various cities of the vast forces which were on the march
to subdue them. The army proceeded from Sardis,
in the spring, in two grand columns, between
which was the king and guards and select troops—all native
Persians, ten thousand foot and ten thousand horse. From
Sardis the hosts of Xerxes proceeded to Abydos, through
Ilium, where his two bridges across the Hellespont awaited
him. From a marble throne the proud and vainglorious
monarch saw his vast army defile over the bridges, perfumed
with frankincense and strewed with myrtle boughs. One
bridge was devoted to the troops, the other to the beasts and
baggage. The first to cross were the ten thousand
household troops, called Immortals, wearing
garlands on their heads; then followed Xerxes himself in
his gilded chariot, and then the rest of the army. It occupied
seven days for the vast hosts to cross the bridge.
Xerxes then directed his march to Doriscus, in Thrace, near
the mouth of the Hebrus, where he joined his fleet. There he
[pg 218]
took a general review, and never, probably, was so great an
army marshaled before or since, and composed of so many
various nations. There were assembled nations
from the Indus, from the Persian Gulf, the Red
Sea, the Levant, the Ægean and the Euxine—Egyptian,
Ethiopian, and Lybian. Forty-six nations were represented—all
that were tributary to Persia. From the estimates
made by Herodotus, there were one million seven hundred
thousand foot, eighty thousand horse, besides a large
number of chariots. With the men who manned the fleet
and those he pressed into his service on the march, the
aggregate of his forces was two million six hundred and forty
thousand. Scarcely an inferior number attended the soldiers
as slaves, sutlers, and other persons, swelling the amount of
the males to five million two hundred and eighty-three thousand
two hundred and twenty—the whole available force of
the Eastern world—Asia against Europe: as in mediæval
times it was Europe against Asia. It is, however, impossible
for us to believe in so large a force, since it could not
have been supplied with provisions. But with every deduction,
it was still the largest army the world ever saw.
After the grand enumeration of forces, Xerxes passed in
his chariot to survey separately each body of
contingents, to which he put questions. He then
embarked in a gilded galley, and sailed past the prows of
the twelve hundred ships moored four hundred feet from the
shore. That such a vast force could be resisted was not even
supposed to be conceivable by the blinded monarch. But
Demaratus, the exiled king of Sparta, told him he would be
resisted unto death, a statement which was received with derision.
After the review, the grand army pursued its course westward
in three divisions and roads along Thrace, levying enormous
contributions on all the Grecian towns, which submitted
as the Persian monarch marched along, for
how could they resist? The mere provisioning
this great host for a single day impoverished the country.
[pg 219]
But there was no help, for to mortal eyes the success of
Xerxes was certain. At Acanthus, Xerxes separated from
his fleet, which was directed to sail round Mount Athos,
while he pursued his march through Pæonia and Crestonia,
and rejoin him at Therma, on the Thermaic Gulf, in Macedonia,
within sight of Mount Olympus.
Meanwhile, the Athenians, fully alive to their danger,
strained every nerve to make preparations to resist
the enemy; fortunately, there was in the treasury
a large sum derived from the Lamian mines, and this they
applied, on the urgent representations of Themistocles, to
building ships and refitting their navy. A Panhellenic
congress, under the presidency of Athens and Sparta,
assembled at the Isthmus of Corinth.—the first great league
since the Trojan war. The representatives of the various
States buried their dissensions, the most prominent of which
were between Athens and Ægina. In reconciling these
feuds, Themistocles took a pre-eminent part. Indeed, there
was need, for the political existence of Hellas was threatened,
and despair was seen in most every city. Even the Delphic
oracle gave out replies discouraging and terrible; intimating,
however, that the safety of Athens lay in the wooden wall,
which, with extraordinary tact, was interpreted by Themistocles
to mean that the true defense lay in the navy.
Salamis was the place designated by the oracle for the retreat,
which was now imperative, and thither the Athenians
fled, with their wives and children, guarded by their fleet.
It was decided by the congress that Sparta should
command the land forces, and Athens the united
navy of the Greeks; but many States, in deadly
fear of the Persians, persisted in neutrality, among which
were Argos, Cretes, Corcyra. The chief glory of the defense
lay with Sparta and Athens. The united army was
sent into Thessaly to defend the defile of Tempe, but discovering
that they were unable to do this, since another pass
over Mount Olympus was open in the summer, they retreated
to the isthmus of Corinth, and left all Greece north of
[pg 220]
Mount Citheron and the Megarid territory without defense.
Had the Greeks been able to maintain the passes of Olympus
and Ossa, all the northern States would probably have joined
in the confederation against Persia; but, as they were left
defenseless, we can not wonder that they submitted, including
even the Achæans, Borotians, and Dorians.
The Pass of Thermopylæ was now fixed upon as the
most convenient place of resistance, next to the
vale of Tempe. Here the main land was separated
from the island of Eubœa by a narrow strait two miles
wide. On the northern part of the island, near the town of
Histiæa, the coast was called Artemisium, and here the fleet
was mustered, to co-operate with the land forces, and oppose,
in a narrow strait, the progress of the Persian fleet. The
defile of Thermopylæ itself, at the south of Thessaly, was
between Mount Œta and an impassable morass on the Maliac
Gulf. Nature had thus provided a double position of defense—a
narrow defile on the land, and a narrow strait on the
water, through which the army and the fleet must need pass
if they would co-operate.
While the congress resolved to avail themselves of the
double position, by sea and land, the Olympic
games, and the great Dorian, of the Carneia, were
at hand. These could not be dispensed with, even
in the most extraordinary crisis to which the nation could be
exposed. While, therefore, the Greeks assembled to keep the
national festivals, probably from religious and superstitious
motives, auguring no good if they were disregarded,
Leonidas, king of Sparta, with three hundred Spartans, two
thousand one hundred and twenty Arcadians, four hundred
Corinthians, two hundred men from Philius, and eighty from
Mycenæ—in all three thousand one hundred hoplites, besides
Helots and light troops, was sent to defend the pass against
the Persian hosts. On the march through Bœotia one thousand
men from Thebes and Thespiæ joined them, though on
the point of submission to Xerxes. The Athenians sent their
whole force on board their ships, joined by the Platæans.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento